So, the implication is that witnesses have been offed, yes?

What are the odds that so many of the defenders of and apologists for the Democratic party, various leaders, nationalism and Capitalism would just coincidentally keep posting things that steer the discussion back to the same theme - that the system would be just fine if we could only crack the case, if we could track down the criminals and bring them to justice?

TIA, you have lost all credibility with me by posting a link to that atrocious article.

Gee, "mobsters," "underworld figures" and law enforcement officers died prematurely from unnatural causes.

Gee, the CIA has worked on assassination techniques, therefore hint hint hint.

You cannot possibly take anything in that article seriously, can you? It skips from unrelated subject to unrelated subject and no attempt is made whatsoever to connect the different subjects.

"In this section, people who were connected - no matter how tenuously - with the assassination and who are now dead are listed according to date of death."

Come on TIA, you can see through that idiocy, no? Clearly the authors are selecting facts that happen to fit in with their preconceived thesis here.

"This section has been entitled 'Convenient Deaths' because these deaths certainly would have been convenient for anyone not wishing the truth of the JFK assassination to become public. Of course, it is impossible to state with any certainty which of these deaths resulted from natural causes and which did not."

The section is called "Convenient Deaths" in order to steer people to the authors' conclusion in a deceptive way.

If it is not possible to "state with any certainty" which deaths are natural and which are not, then the entire basis for the article collapses.

Those are just a few of the (mind-numbingly obvious) nonsensical and idiotic things in that article.